Privacy Choices

Choose what we measure. You can change this at any time.

Loading...

Steps counted when you are not taking any

Sitting, typing, eating and desk work
MOTION

Accuracy

100%

Seated Recordings With No False Step

across 60 recordings in which no step was taken (15 subjects)

Sample size

15 participants

Sitting still, typing, eating and working at a desk, the Ultrahuman Ring recorded no steps at all — in every single recording.

0%25%50%75%100%100%Sitting still34 recordings100%Typing10 recordings100%Eating5 recordings100%Desk work11 recordingsshare of recordings in which no step was counted (%)
0.0/minfalse steps in any seated recording
60seated recordings, every one of them zero
100%of those recordings with no false step
0steps counted while sitting, typing, eating or at a desk
Figure 1 — Every bar is full because every recording came back at zero. Zero means zero, not a rounded-down small number.

Your hands are busy all day without going anywhere. Typing, scrolling, cutting food, tapping a desk: all of it is rhythmic, all of it sits in roughly the frequency band a stride occupies, and a step counter sees the lot. Every phantom step it accepts is a step you did not take, quietly inflating a number you are trying to trust.

Across 60 seated recordings — sitting quietly, typing, eating and ordinary desk work — the Ultrahuman Ring recorded not one step. This is also the emptiest cell in the published literature: no smart ring of any brand has ever been measured for how often it counts a step that was not taken.

The reason the ring holds at zero is structural. It does not count a step the moment your hand moves in a rhythm. It first has to be satisfied that you were walking at all, and it settles that by looking at the whole stretch rather than a single second of it. Typing is rhythmic for a second or two at a time. Walking is rhythmic for minutes on end, and that difference is what the ring reads.